Independent tracker · Est. September 2026

The Uganda AI Scorecard

What Uganda's institutions have promised on artificial intelligence and emerging technology, what has shipped, and what the record shows. Every status is traceable to a linked source.

Version 1.3 Published 14 September 2026 Next review December 2026 Compiled by Evelyn Namara · independent

The Verdict

Ambition is running ahead of machinery. Uganda has validated its AI evidence base, named sovereignty as the goal, and published a real jobs strategy with a real baseline. But the flagship strategy is a quarter past its own deadline with no revised public timeline, no delivery machinery — owner, budget, KPIs, reporting rhythm — is public for any AI commitment, and the automated systems already scoring Ugandans remain ungoverned while the legal framework waits on the strategy.

Context: Oxford Insights' 2025 Government AI Readiness Index places Sub-Saharan Africa last of nine world regions — which is precisely why the machinery, not the ambition, is the differentiator among the region's strategies.

The board at a glance — one segment per commitment, coloured by status. Details in the ledger below.

6
Commitments tracked
1
Delivered
2
In progress
1
Overdue
1
Announced
1
No public evidence

The Ledger

Each entry records who made the commitment, what was promised, and what could be verified from public sources on the date checked. Accountability framing, not opposition: the point is delivery, not blame.

UG-01 National AI & Emerging Technologies Strategy Overdue
Ministry of ICT & National Guidance, with NITA-U · originated in a Cabinet directive · due June 2026

PS Dr. Aminah Zawedde committed to a strategy finalized and ready for implementation by June 2026, anchored in NDP IV. Nationwide consultations since 12 March 2026; the effort began as a Cabinet directive for an AI policy and broadened into a full emerging-technologies strategy (Commissioner Ambrose Ruyooka, on record).

Drafting phase effectively complete; not adopted as of 14 Sept 2026. Because Cabinet commissioned it, adoption runs through Cabinet — no public record of the draft's submission located. The June date passed without a revised public timeline. The gap to watch: does the version Cabinet approves name its owner, budget line, KPIs and reporting rhythm?

→ What moves this: Cabinet adoption + a published implementation plan moves this to Delivered, and spawns new tracked entries for each promise inside the strategy.

UG-02 AI Readiness Assessment (UNESCO RAM) Delivered
Ministry of ICT & National Guidance + UNESCO · Lead National Expert: Dr. Joyce Nakatumba-Nabende, Makerere AI Lab

Conducted under UNESCO's Readiness Assessment Methodology (process launched Feb 2026) and validated at Hotel Africana, Kampala, 26 May 2026. Findings on record: a research ecosystem producing globally recognised work in health, agriculture, language technology and environmental monitoring; no AI-specific legal framework; the 2019 data protection law silent on algorithmic transparency and automated decision-making; broadband affordability a major gap.

The full report has not been located in public circulation. Publishing it would let the evidence base behind the strategy be examined rather than taken on faith.

→ What moves this: Public release of the full readiness report closes the transparency caveat.

UG-03 First dedicated AI law No public evidence
Government of Uganda · ministry not yet formally assigned in the public record

Industry regulatory trackers report a first AI law expected between late 2025 and 2026. The gap the law would fill is confirmed on record: the UNESCO readiness findings state Uganda lacks an AI-specific legal framework and that the 2019 data protection law does not cover automated decision-making.

No bill text, gazette notice, or ministry announcement of a draft law located as of the check date; the timeline rests on secondary sources. Daily Monitor has reported a Kenyan firm contracted for AI regulation work (article paywalled).

→ What moves this: A published draft bill or gazette notice moves this to In Progress.

UG-04 AI sovereignty foundations: data, compute, energy, models, applications, skills Announced
Minister for Science, Technology & Innovation, Eng. Jonard Asiimwe · STI Secretariat, Office of the President · Sept 2026

Uganda intends to build the capacity to develop, govern and benefit from AI rather than remain dependent on foreign systems, with investment across six named foundations.

The right foundations, correctly named. No costed plan, sequencing, or budget line is public yet. This is the commitment this scorecard will watch hardest.

→ What moves this: A costed, sequenced plan or a budget line for any of the six foundations moves this to In Progress.

Nilepost (Sept 2026) ↗ checked 14 Sep 2026
UG-05 150,000 BPO jobs by 2030 — National BPO Policy & Job Creation Strategy In progress
Ministry of ICT & National Guidance · policy launched 24 Feb 2025 by Min. Chris Baryomunsi · due 2030

An official, published target: the ministry hosts the full BPO & IT Services Job Creation Strategy and maintains a sector database. Ministry-stated baseline: 243 registered companies, 50 active firms, over 10,000 direct jobs and roughly 15,000 indirect.

Upgraded from "announced" in v1.0 after primary sources were verified. The baseline is roughly 7% of the 2030 target with four years to run; no regular public progress reporting located, and no published analysis of what AI automation does to the entry-level tasks the target depends on.

→ What moves this: The first official progress report against the 150,000 target turns this from a tracked promise into a measurable trajectory.

UG-06 Digital Transformation Roadmap: infrastructure, services, cybersecurity & data protection, skilling, innovation In progress
Ministry of ICT & National Guidance · PS Dr. Aminah Zawedde · framed Mar 2026

Named as the foundation the AI strategy builds on, with active programs across its five pillars.

The base layer. If the AI strategy's ambitions outrun this roadmap's delivery, the sequencing problem lands here first.

→ What moves this: Continued delivery evidence at the next NDP IV reporting cycle sustains this status.

Ministry of ICT (Mar 2026) ↗ checked 14 Sep 2026

Uganda in the Neighbourhood

Five markers of strategy maturity, checked against four comparator states. The purpose is not ranking; it is knowing what "done" looks like elsewhere so Uganda's own promises can be measured against it.

Country Strategy launched Roadmap w/ KPIs public Progress dashboard live Cabinet-level AI body Readiness assessment Note
Uganda ✕ drafting — unverified ✓ May 2026 Strategy in national consultation since Mar 2026; readiness validated May 2026.
Kenya ✓ Mar 2025 — promised ✓ committee — unverified Roadmap with KPIs + secretariat; Standing Cabinet Committee on AI; dashboard promised in the roadmap.
Rwanda ✓ 2023 — unverified — C4IR — unverified Hosts C4IR Rwanda and the Gates-funded AI Scaling Hub ($7.5M Apr 2025 → $17.5M Oct 2025).
Tunisia ✓ 2026–2030 — unverified — unverified — unverified Explicit technological-sovereignty framing; locally owned models as a stated goal.
South Africa ✕ withdrawn 2026 — unverified ✓ UNESCO Draft National AI Policy pulled after hallucinated citations were exposed in drafting.
verified from a primary or strong secondary source verifiably not in place could not be verified by this review ✕ withdrawn formally pulled

Watching Next

The events that would move statuses on this board.

Method

This scorecard tracks public commitments by Ugandan institutions on AI and emerging technology, and checks them against public evidence. It is independent: not affiliated with, funded by, or reviewed by the Government of Uganda or any political organisation.

What qualifies as a tracked commitment: it must be (1) public, (2) attributable to a named institution or official, and (3) objectively assessable — naming a deliverable, a date, or a measurable target that evidence can confirm or deny. Aspirations that cannot be checked are not tracked.

Every status links to its source. Where a claim rests only on secondary reporting, the entry says so. Where evidence could not be found, the status says that too, because "we could not verify" is information. Every entry carries a "what moves this" line: the next event that would change its rating. Statuses are re-checked quarterly, and corrections with evidence are welcome and will be credited.

The methodology draws on the independent-assessment model of the Climate Action Tracker and the promise-tracking standard of the Polimeter. Underlying data is maintained as versioned JSON and will be published with the website edition of this scorecard.

Delivered
met, with public evidence
In progress
active, verifiable work underway
Overdue
a stated deadline passed without delivery
Announced
stated publicly; no implementation evidence yet
No public evidence
no primary public source located
Withdrawn
formally pulled back or abandoned